{"id":4720,"date":"2008-03-29T17:13:56","date_gmt":"2008-03-29T16:13:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/w2.noticiasarquitectura.info\/en\/eiffel-tower-denied-possibility-of-top-floor-being-transformed\/"},"modified":"2008-03-29T17:13:56","modified_gmt":"2008-03-29T16:13:56","slug":"eiffel-tower-denied-possibility-of-top-floor-being-transformed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/en\/eiffel-tower-denied-possibility-of-top-floor-being-transformed\/","title":{"rendered":"Eiffel Tower: denied possibility of top floor being transformed"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"testo_en\"><p>Eiffel Tower operating company denied the intention of expanding top floor, thus bringing into discredit the not requested offer by a team of architects that <a href=\"http:\/\/noticiasarquitecturablog.blogspot.com\/2008\/03\/nuevo-mirador-para-la-torre-eiffel.html\" target=\"_blank\">proposed to extend the surface of the third floor<\/a>. In a press release, &#8220;the SETE (Societe d&rsquo;Exploitation de la Tour Eiffel) reminds it has not launched any bid related to the monument  top expansion and points out that Paris-based firm (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.serero.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Serero Architects<\/a>) was never candidate&#8221; to be called for a consultancy&#8230; [<a href=\"http:\/\/www.eluniversal.com\/2008\/03\/27\/cul_ava_desmienten-posible-m_27A1464759.shtml\" target=\"_blank\">eluniversal.com<\/a> \/ <a href=\"http:\/\/archinect.com\/news\/article.php?id=73261_0_24_0_C\" target=\"_blank\">Archinect<\/a>]<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Eiffel Tower operating company denied the intention of expanding top floor, thus bringing into discredit the not requested offer by a team of architects that proposed to extend the surface of the third floor. In a press release, &#8220;the SETE (Societe d&rsquo;Exploitation de la Tour Eiffel) reminds it has not launched any bid related to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4721,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-4720","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-en"},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4720\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4721"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}