{"id":1865,"date":"2011-04-27T21:03:14","date_gmt":"2011-04-27T20:03:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nfw.professionearchitetto.it\/it\/studio-daniel-libeskind-18-36-54-casa-in-connecticut\/"},"modified":"2011-04-27T21:03:14","modified_gmt":"2011-04-27T20:03:14","slug":"studio-daniel-libeskind-18-36-54-casa-in-connecticut","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/it\/studio-daniel-libeskind-18-36-54-casa-in-connecticut\/","title":{"rendered":"Studio Daniel Libeskind: &#8216;18.36.54&#8217; &#8211; casa in Connecticut"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"testo_it\"><p>Stati Uniti &gt; La &#8220;18.36.54 House&#8221; in Connecticut, progettata dallo <a href=\"http:\/\/www.daniel-libeskind.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Studio Daniel  Libeskind<\/a> [<a href=\"http:\/\/archrecord.construction.com\/residential\/recordHouses\/2011\/18-36-54-House.asp\" target=\"_blank\">Architectural  Record<\/a>].<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Stati Uniti &gt; La &#8220;18.36.54 House&#8221; in Connecticut, progettata dallo Studio Daniel Libeskind [Architectural Record].<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1866,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[458,20,7],"class_list":{"0":"post-1865","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-it","8":"tag-daniel-libeskind","9":"tag-estados-unidos","10":"tag-vivienda"},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1865","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1865"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1865\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1866"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1865"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1865"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.professionearchitetto.it\/news\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1865"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}